Good practices

GOOD PRACTICES
An extra dose of plagiarism
GOOD PRACTICES
Insufficient care taken with review articles
GOOD PRACTICES
National research on misconduct
GOOD PRACTICES
Scientist rehabilitation program
GOOD PRACTICES
Goiânia will host meeting on integrity
GOOD PRACTICES
The specter of duplicate images
GOOD PRACTICES
The Russian roulette of plagiarism
GOOD PRACTICES
More transparent conflicts of interest
GOOD PRACTICES
A varied menu of fraud
GOOD PRACTICES
When plagiarism doesn’t appear to involve bad faith
GOOD PRACTICES
Defective peer review
GOOD PRACTICES
Localized effects of retraction
Investigation resumed
GOOD PRACTICES
A strict and innovative punishment
GOOD PRACTICES
Investigation completed
GOOD PRACTICES
Corrective mechanisms
GOOD PRACTICES
Under new management
GOOD PRACTICES
Masked frauds
GOOD PRACTICES
Unqualified reviewer
GOOD PRACTICES
Ethics in sponsored research
GOOD PRACTICES
Journal about integrity
GOOD PRACTICES
Made-up records
GOOD PRACTICES
Universities promote integrity
GOOD PRACTICES
Repercussions of investigations
GOOD PRACTICES
Policies on retraction of articles
GOOD PRACTICES
A strict approach to scientific images
GOOD PRACTICES
Fraud results in prison for the guilty party
GOOD PRACTICES
Unfounded Research
GOOD PRACTICES
Professional Impact of a Retraction
GOOD PRACTICES
Mapping plagiarism

Anteriores