Good practices

GOOD PRACTICES
Statistical inconsistencies
GOOD PRACTICES
The limits of anonymous accusations
GOOD PRACTICES
More voices in the debate
GOOD PRACTICES
Different Reactions
GOOD PRACTICES
The danger of publishing in predatory journals
GOOD PRACTICES
Two instances of plagiarism and one of self-plagiarism
GOOD PRACTICES
Strictness and transparency in biomedical research
GOOD PRACTICES
An extra dose of plagiarism
GOOD PRACTICES
Insufficient care taken with review articles
GOOD PRACTICES
National research on misconduct
GOOD PRACTICES
Scientist rehabilitation program
GOOD PRACTICES
Goiânia will host meeting on integrity
GOOD PRACTICES
The specter of duplicate images
GOOD PRACTICES
The Russian roulette of plagiarism
GOOD PRACTICES
More transparent conflicts of interest
GOOD PRACTICES
A varied menu of fraud
GOOD PRACTICES
When plagiarism doesn’t appear to involve bad faith
GOOD PRACTICES
Defective peer review
GOOD PRACTICES
Localized effects of retraction
Investigation resumed
GOOD PRACTICES
A strict and innovative punishment
GOOD PRACTICES
Investigation completed
GOOD PRACTICES
Corrective mechanisms
GOOD PRACTICES
Under new management
GOOD PRACTICES
Masked frauds
GOOD PRACTICES
Unqualified reviewer
GOOD PRACTICES
Ethics in sponsored research
GOOD PRACTICES
Journal about integrity
GOOD PRACTICES
Made-up records
GOOD PRACTICES
Universities promote integrity

Anteriores