{"id":151124,"date":"2014-05-20T17:27:31","date_gmt":"2014-05-20T20:27:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=151124"},"modified":"2014-06-20T17:29:44","modified_gmt":"2014-06-20T20:29:44","slug":"nonsense-papers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/nonsense-papers\/","title":{"rendered":"Nonsense papers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-151125 alignright\" alt=\"Boas Praticas\" src=\"http:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Boas-Praticas1.jpg\" width=\"290\" height=\"448\" srcset=\"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Boas-Praticas1.jpg 290w, https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Boas-Praticas1-120x185.jpg 120w, https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Boas-Praticas1-250x386.jpg 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 290px) 100vw, 290px\" \/><span class=\"media-credits-inline\">Daniel bueno<\/span>The Springer publishing house has announced the withdrawal of 18 papers published in conference proceedings in the fields of computer science and engineering between 2008 and 2013. Three months ago, the publisher was alerted to the fact that a number of papers submitted to conference proceedings published in Springer publications had been generated by a software program that creates nonsense papers. The following month, it decided to retract the papers\u2014a form of official \u201cde-publication\u201d\u2014rather than simply remove them from its system, because it was the \u201cbest available mechanism for correcting the literature and ensuring its integrity.\u201d The publisher will also more closely monitor its review process for papers accepted at conferences. In addition to the Springer-published papers, over 100 papers published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), the renowned global institution of technology professionals, were also identified as fake. Among them was a 2013 article about new methodologies for building an e-commerce website. The authors write in the abstract that they \u201cconcentrate our efforts on disproving that spreadsheets can be made knowledge-based, empathic and compact,\u201d\u2014a statement that is clearly meaningless. Most of the conferences that accepted fake papers were held in China, and the majority of authors have Chinese affiliation.<\/p>\n<p>The software capable of producing such aberrations is SCIgen, which combines random strings of words to generate fake papers in the field of computer science. The program was invented in 2005 by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for the purpose of proving that many conferences held in computer science accept papers for publication without proper review. Since SCIgen is available on the Internet, anyone can use it. \u201cI wasn\u2019t aware of the scale of the problem, but I knew it definitely happens,\u201d Jeremy Stribling, who cowrote the software, told the journal <i>Nature <\/i>in an interview.<\/p>\n<p>The falsifications were reported by Cyril Labb\u00e9, a computer scientist and researcher at Joseph Fourier University in France. In 2012, he began the work of cataloging computer-generated papers that had been published in more than 30 conference proceedings over the past five years. Labb\u00e9 developed a technique for detecting papers created by SCIgen, described in an article published in the journal <i>Scientometrics<\/i> in 2012. The method involves searching for the characteristic vocabulary produced by the program. Springer has announced a partnership with Labb\u00e9 to work on developing mechanisms for detecting fake papers generated by SCIgen or similar programs that might emerge in the future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Nonsense papers","protected":false},"author":475,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[155],"tags":[215],"coauthors":[785],"class_list":["post-151124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-practices","tag-scientometrics"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/475"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151124"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=151124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}