{"id":352152,"date":"2020-10-14T14:42:58","date_gmt":"2020-10-14T17:42:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=352152"},"modified":"2020-10-14T14:42:58","modified_gmt":"2020-10-14T17:42:58","slug":"change-with-stability-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/change-with-stability-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Change with stability"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 2018, FAPESP invested R$1,216,750,480 in 24,720 research projects spread across all areas of knowledge. The amount was 15% higher than it was in 2017, in nominal values, and 6% higher when considering inflation\u2014which breaks the downward trend in investment that began in the mid-2010s as a result of the economic slowdown. The Foundation\u2019s budget is comprised of 1% of the tax revenue of the state of S\u00e3o Paulo, passed on by the Treasury, as determined by the S\u00e3o Paulo Constitution of 1989, and of funds from agreements with institutions and businesses to jointly fund research. The audit report can be found in the Relat\u00f3rio de Atividades FAPESP 2018 (FAPESP 2018 Activities Report), released in August, which is available in full at fapesp.br\/publicacoes. The website also provides annual summaries of the Foundation\u2019s work since 1962, the year in which its activities began.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe year 2018 has been one of major political changes in the country and of expectations for the future of higher education, science, and technology,\u201d said FAPESP President Marco Antonio Zago in the opening of the report. \u201cIn this scenario, FAPESP has maintained its strong presence, marked by stability, a growing presence within the S\u00e3o Paulo science and technology system, and increased visibility at home and abroad.\u201d Among the initiatives that stood out, one example was Young Researchers Award \u2013 Phase 2, which aims at consolidating high-impact lines of research created by scientists who benefited from the Jovens Pesquisadores em Centros Emergentes<\/em> (Young Researchers in Emerging Centers) program. Created in 1995, the program seeks to attract young PhD holders from Brazil and other countries to lead research groups. Approximately 1,600 researchers have already been considered; there are 227 ongoing projects in Phase 1 and 36 in Phase 2. Last year, R$59.6 million was invested in the program.<\/p>\n

In 2018, 77 Thematic Projects were funded. This category supports research projects with bold objectives, developed by general research teams from various institutions, and for a period of up to five years. The investment in Thematic Projects in 2018 totaled R$247.4 million. There are currently 418 Thematic Projects in progress.<\/p>\n<\/div>

\n \n \n \n <\/picture><\/div>
\n

There has also been the restoration\u2014after an evaluation by an international committee\u2014of the 17 Research, Innovation and Dissemination Centers (RIDC), which are networks of researchers dedicated to topics that are on the frontier of knowledge and impact society the most; these centers can be supported for up to 11 years.<\/p>\n

New to the 2018 report was the presentation of investments made by the Foundation under six different funding strategies. The Research for the Advancement of Knowledge category, which ranges from short-term projects to more ambitious ones such as Thematic Projects and RIDC projects, accounted for 51% of the disbursements: more than 5,000 grants were given in this category. Another 24% was invested in human resources education for science and technology: FAPESP allocated R$293 million to 10,222 grants in Brazil and abroad, offering 4,386 new grants. Ten percent of the proceeds went to supporting research infrastructure through equipment purchase or repair, among other necessities. The Research for Innovation category, which encompasses projects in collaboration with businesses, accounted for 9.5% of the disbursements. One of the highlights was the approval of 270 new projects under the Research for Innovation in Small Businesses, RISB (PIPE, in the portuguese acronym). Finally, 4.5% went to research on strategic topics, such as climate change, bioenergy, biodiversity, and eScience; the remaining 1% was invested in research dissemination, mapping, and evaluation.<\/p>\n\n \n \n \n <\/picture>\n

In terms of how the resources were distributed by field of knowledge, the 2018 data remain the same as those from previous years: the life sciences accounted for 47% of the disbursements; the exact sciences, Earth sciences, and engineering accounted for 33%; and the humanities and social sciences accounted for 9%. The remaining 11% were allocated to interdisciplinary research. When the institutional links of funded researchers are analyzed, the University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP) once again occupies first place, having received 43.2% of the resources, followed by the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), with 14.8%. Federal research institutions in the state of S\u00e3o Paulo came in third place, with 12.5%, and S\u00e3o Paulo State University (UNESP) held fourth place, with 11.2%.<\/p>\n

In 2018, five new Centros de Pesquisa em Engenharia <\/em>(Engineering Research Centers\u2014CPE) were set up in cooperation with universities and businesses; four of the centers collaborated with Shell to develop innovation in the field of new energies, and one collaborated with the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), the Genomics for Climate Change Research Center. In these centers, every R$1 invested by FAPESP is matched by another R$1 from the business in question and R$2 from the university or research institute that houses the center. \u201cThe Engineering Research Centers elevate the boldness of collaborative research between universities and companies and mobilize academic and business researchers around major challenges,\u201d explains FAPESP Scientific Director Carlos Henrique de Brito Cruz.<\/p>\n<\/div>

\n \n \n \n <\/picture><\/div>
\n

The four centers working with Shell should receive up to R$34.7 million from the company. FAPESP has allocated them R$23.1 million, while R$53 million will come from partner universities and research institutes in the form of salaries for researchers and support staff, infrastructure, and facilities. Two of the centers involve a collaboration with UNICAMP: one for the study of dense energy carriers, with the university\u2019s Institute of Chemistry, and one for advanced energy storage, with the School of Chemical Engineering. The center for computational science of materials is based at the USP Institute of Chemistry in S\u00e3o Carlos, while the Institute for Energy and Nuclear Research (IPEN) houses the center dedicated to developing sustainable routes for methane conversion through electrochemical technologies. \u201cRenewable energy production could triple by 2050,\u201d explained Dutch geologist Joep Huijsmans, leader of Shell\u2019s new energy research and technology division, at the launch of the centers. \u201cIn any case, we will still need large quantities of oil and gas to supply the full range of energy products the world needs.\u201d Since 2015, FAPESP and Shell have shared a Gas Innovation CPE based at the Polytechnic School of USP.<\/p>\n\n \n \n \n <\/picture>\n

In the case of the EMBRAPA and UNICAMP center, the goal is to generate innovations that increase the resistance of plants to drought and heat and to transfer technologies to the productive sector using tools such as genetic engineering and genome editing. The investment from EMBRAPA should reach R$32.9 million, which will be matched by R$25.2 million from FAPESP and R$44.7 million from UNICAMP. In 2018, FAPESP invested R$12 million to support the 10 centers. In addition to Shell and EMBRAPA, there are centers in partnership with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Natura, and Peugeot Citro\u00ebn. Three other CPEs were being negotiated with Equinor, Koppert, and Grupo S\u00e3o Martinho <\/em>and were launched in 2019.<\/p>\n

FAPESP has allocated R$216.6 million to collaborative research. To stimulate international cooperation, the Foundation invested R$133.7 million, emphasizing the categories of Research Internships Abroad (BEPE), which range from scientific initiation to postdoctoral grants, and Research Fellowships Abroad (BPE), which are accessible to researchers who have already finished their education, including senior researchers.<\/p>\n\n \n \n \n <\/picture>\n

Exact and earth sciences<\/strong>
\nThere was an increase in the number of postdoctoral grants awarded to foreigners in 2018. They totaled 131, making up 18.8% of the 694 grants of this type that were awarded\u2014the highest amount in the last four years. The ability to attract scientists from abroad is an indicator of the competitiveness of research groups. The exact and Earth sciences stood out. Of the 182 postdoctoral grants in the country awarded in this area, 59 grants\u2014or 32%\u2014were for researchers who obtained their undergraduate degrees abroad. In 2007, this rate was 16%. Engineering comes in next, with 27% of all postdoctoral grants awarded to foreigners. The humanities and interdisciplinary areas had 21% each; the applied social sciences had 14%; the health sciences and linguistics, languages, and arts had 13% each; the biological sciences had 9%; and the agricultural sciences had 7%.<\/p>\n

One of the strategies used by FAPESP to attract talent from abroad is the S\u00e3o Paulo School of Advanced Science (ESPCA) program, which helps implement short courses on advanced topics in S\u00e3o Paulo institutions. They are meant for undergraduate and graduate students, as well as young PhD holders\u2014at least half of whom need to be recruited from abroad. One of the goals is to show students and researchers from abroad the research opportunities in S\u00e3o Paulo and attract the best talent. In 2018, 13 ESPCAs were held: seven at USP, three at UNICAMP, one at Mackenzie Presbyterian University, one at the Institute for Energy and Nuclear Research (IPEN), and one at the Brazilian Center for Analysis and Planning (CEBRAP).<\/p>\n<\/div>

\n \n \n \n <\/picture><\/div>
\n

FAPESP\u2019s activities in 2018 were supported by more than 9,000 opinion-givers and scientific advisors, who analyzed the merits of 19,724 projects. These professionals issued 22,162 opinions, which resulted in the decision to award grants to 10,946 projects during the year; these added to the 13,774 projects that had already begun earlier. The average time for the analysis of each proposal was 70 days.<\/p>\n

Published in September 2019<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Report highlights the 2018 investments of FAPESP both in research in collaboration with businesses and in the international recognition of science produced in S\u00e3o Paulo","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[166],"tags":[226,234,256],"coauthors":[98],"class_list":["post-352152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-policies-st-en","tag-education","tag-finance","tag-public-policies"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352152"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":354848,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352152\/revisions\/354848"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352152"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=352152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}