{"id":438263,"date":"2022-05-30T15:16:52","date_gmt":"2022-05-30T18:16:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=438263"},"modified":"2022-05-30T16:40:58","modified_gmt":"2022-05-30T19:40:58","slug":"pasture-management-and-dietary-changes-make-livestock-more-sustainable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/pasture-management-and-dietary-changes-make-livestock-more-sustainable\/","title":{"rendered":"Pasture management and dietary changes make livestock more sustainable"},"content":{"rendered":"

According to experts, the predominant livestock model in Brazil\u2014where cattle are raised on large areas of planted or natural pasture\u2014offers great potential for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through photosynthesis. When poorly managed, however, this system results in low productivity and land degradation, and a constant need to seek new pasture areas. It is estimated that around 82 million hectares (ha) of Brazil\u2019s pasture area\u2014about half of the total\u2014shows some degree of degradation.<\/p>\n

One of the most promising ways to reduce GHG emissions in livestock farming is to manage soil and pasture more efficiently. \u201cInadequate pasture management, mainly caused by not adjusting the stocking density [number of animals per ha] in response to the forage available, together with a lack of fertilization and supplementation of the animals’ diet in periods of forage shortage, are the main factors that increase greenhouse gas emissions and soil degradation, which also contributes to the emission of CO2<\/sub> [carbon dioxide],\u201d says Ricardo Andrade Reis, a zootechnician from the School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences at S\u00e3o Paulo State University (UNESP), Jabuticabal campus.<\/p>\n

Read more:<\/strong>
\n– Brazil making efforts to reduce the carbon footprint of livestock<\/a><\/div>\n

Reis leads a project funded by FAPESP that is studying management strategies for reducing the environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems. \u201cManaging pastures to avoid elongation of stems and growth of leaves, which have a high fiber content and are thus less easily digestible, has been used with success in our research,\u201d says Reis. \u201cEnteric methane [CH4<\/sub>] emission is highly related to fiber-rich forage intake, which leads to the development of methanogenic [methane-generating] organisms in the rumen.\u201d An article describing the results of the study was published in the journal Agronomy<\/em> in 2020.<\/p>\n

Research carried out by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) with funding from FAPESP also concluded that raising cattle in properly managed pasture areas with the appropriate number of animals per ha can increase carbon sequestration. The study, described in the scientific journal Animal<\/em> in 2020, showed that steers\u2014young cattle in the growth phase\u2014raised under this system had a positive impact on the environment, equivalent to the annual growth of six eucalyptus trees.<\/p>\n

According to Patr\u00edcia Perondi Anch\u00e3o Oliveira, the agronomist who led the study, the performance was obtained in the Atlantic Forest biome, on a ranch where a previously degraded pasture area was recovered with chemical correctives and fertilizers. The area was occupied with 3.3 animal units (AUs) per ha\u2014one animal unit corresponds to 450 kg of live weight. The carbon balance was calculated based on GHG emissions from animals and from the manufacturing and application of fertilizers.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Abmael Cardoso<\/span>Cattle grazing at the EMBRAPA farm in S\u00e3o Carlos, S\u00e3o PauloAbmael Cardoso<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

In a degraded area where correctives and fertilizers are not used and the occupation is 1.4 AU\/ha, 64 trees need to be planted for each steer to balance the emissions. \u201cCattle farming with proper pasture management and occupation can even generate a carbon surplus, while raising animals in degraded areas results in poor economic performance and a high environmental impact,\u201d says Anch\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

Recent tests carried out at ESALQ, with funding from FAPESP, have also revealed the benefits of well-kept pasture areas. \u201cA study of dairy cattle showed that it is possible to increase daily milk production per cow by 15%, increase pasture stocking rate by 33%, and increase milk production per ha per day by 51% just by putting the animals out to graze at the right time [when the pasture is at the appropriate height],\u201d says agronomist Sila Carneiro da Silva, one of the coordinators of the study.<\/p>\n

According to Silva, there was also a 21% reduction in enteric methane emission by the cows\u2014measured in grams of CH4<\/sub> per liter of milk produced\u2014and an approximately 40% decrease in nitrous oxide emission from the soil compared to inadequate pasture management. \u201cCorrecting when animals are put out to graze and removed from the pasture is a zero-cost technology. There is no need for any new investment,\u201d says Silva. The results of the research, carried out as part of agronomist Guilhermo Congio\u2019s PhD, were published in the journal Science of the Total Environment<\/em> in 2018 and 2019.<\/p>\n

Cattle burps<\/strong>
\nWhile cattle ranchers are making progress in the development of more efficient farming systems that provide a sustainable balance of GHG emissions, they are facing another more complex challenge: how to reduce emissions inherent to cattle farming, such as the gases generated in the ruminant digestive process and released by belching.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Guilhermo Congio<\/span>Researcher measures the height of the pastureGuilhermo Congio<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cScientists are looking for ways to directly manipulate the fermentation process to reduce methane emissions,\u201d explains Alexandre Berndt, a researcher at Embrapa Southeast Livestock in S\u00e3o Carlos, S\u00e3o Paulo. Two approaches are being studied at research centers around the world: the first is food that is more easily digestible by cattle, and the second is nutritional dietary additives that reduce the emission of potentially harmful gases.<\/p>\n

The challenge in researching food additives is to create alternative substances that reduce CH4<\/sub> generation without impacting the health and food safety of the animals. One promising ingredient with great potential to reduce enteric methane emissions is the solvent bromoform, which is found naturally in a microalgae called red algae (Asparagopsis taxiformis<\/em>), common in Australia. In March 2021, scientists from the University of California in the USA and James Cook University in Australia published an article in the journal PLOS One<\/em> showing that adding red algae to the diet of beef steers can reduce methane emissions by up to 87%, with no impact on their weight gain.<\/p>\n

In the Netherlands, DSM Animal Nutrition & Health developed an organic compound called 3-nitrooxypropanol (3NOP), which is formed of nitrate and a biological type of alcohol and sold under the trade name Bovaer. Giving ruminants one teaspoon of the additive per day can have an impact on the microorganisms in the rumen and reduce methane emissions, Gareth Mead, senior director of global communications at DSM, told Pesquisa FAPESP<\/em>.<\/p>\n

It took a decade to develop 3NOP, with 50 scientific articles published on the topic. According to the company, enteric emissions are reduced by around 30% in dairy cows, but the impact can be even greater in beef cattle, at around 90%. A study led by Reis from UNESP found that the additive can reduce methane emissions in Nelore bulls by more than 40%. The results were published in the Journal of Animal Science<\/em> in November 2020.<\/p>\n

In September 2021, Brazil and Chile were the first countries to approve the product for sale. The European Union later followed suit and authorized Bovaer for commercial use. Mead pointed out that DSM has not yet started selling the product, but it plans to do so in the next few months.<\/p>\n

\"\"

L\u00e9o Ramos Chaves<\/span>Cattle feeding from a trough on a farm in Altair, in the interior of S\u00e3o Paulo StateL\u00e9o Ramos Chaves<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

Another line of research into additives is studying tannins, a type of polymer found in acacia, fruit, and leguminous trees. \u201cTannins are antimicrobial and can potentially reduce the degradation of food proteins in the rumen, leading to a reduction in methane production,\u201d explains Renata Helena Branco Arnandes, a doctor of zootechnics from the Zootechnic Institute (IZ), linked to the S\u00e3o Paulo State Department of Agriculture and Food Supply.<\/p>\n

In 2021, with funding from FAPESP’s State Research Institute Modernization Program, IZ inaugurated a Laboratory for Ruminal Fermentation and Beef Cattle Nutrition. One of the lab’s first tasks was to validate and test a tannin-based additive developed in partnership by Italian company SilvaTeam, which created the active ingredient, and Brazilian food-processing company JBS. The aim was to establish the absolute methane reduction provided by the additive and to obtain data on the appropriate dosage.<\/p>\n

\u201cSilvafeed has already been sold in several countries, including Brazil, but it was our research that demonstrated its impact on methane emissions,\u201d says Arnandes. \u201cAdding this molecule [the tannin-based additive] to the diet decreased enteric methane emissions by about 10% compared to cattle given a control diet.\u201d<\/p>\n

The IZ is also partnered with the School of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics (FMVZ) at the University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP) and EMBRAPA for a project funded by FAPESP to investigate ways of mitigating livestock GHG emissions. The research is being led by Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues, a veterinarian from FMVZ.<\/p>\n

One of the main areas of study is the use of forage reserves (grasses and legumes) as feed in the winter and dry period, in combination with protein supplementation with salt and nitrate instead of the traditional mineral supplementation of salt and urea. Nitrate, like urea, is a source of nonprotein nitrogen for cattle. The difference is its potential to dissipate hydrogen in rumen fermentation, reducing methane production.<\/p>\n

The two institutions are also working together to research foods that are easier to digest and that result in lower GHG emissions. One study is examining the use of integrated legume and grass pastures. The most promising approach appears to be to combine the grass Brachiaria brizantha<\/em> with legumes such as Macrotyloma axillare and Cajanus cajan<\/em>. The mixture improves biological activity in the soil and increases carbon stocks and pasture productivity. Despite the potential improvements to productivity and sustainability offered by intercrop pastures, the practice is still not widely used due to a lack of knowledge of the subject in Brazil.<\/p>\n

Projects<\/strong>
\n1.<\/strong> Management strategies for reducing environmental impacts in beef cattle production systems (n\u00ba. 15\/16631-5<\/a>); Grant Mechanism<\/strong> Global Climate Change Research Program; Principal Investigator<\/strong> Ricardo Andrade Reis (UNESP); Investment<\/strong> R$2,310,888.97.
\n2.<\/strong> Strategic practices to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in pasture systems in Southeast Brazil (n\u00ba. 17\/20084-5<\/a>); Grant Mechanism<\/strong> Global Climate Change Research Program; Principal Investigator<\/strong> Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues (USP); Investment<\/strong> R$2,245,203.83.
\n3.<\/strong> Nutritional value, milk production, and greenhouse gas emissions in Cameroon elephant grass subjected to rotational dairy cow grazing strategies (n\u00ba. 16\/22040-2<\/a>); Grant Mechanism<\/strong> Regular Research Grant; Principal Investigator<\/strong> Sila Carneiro da Silva (USP); Investment<\/strong> R$109,820.23.
\n4.<\/strong> Nitrogen balance, greenhouse gas emissions, and N2O mitigation in cattle production on pasture (n\u00ba. 12\/06718-8<\/a>); Grant Mechanism<\/strong> Doctoral (PhD) Fellowship; Supervisor<\/strong> Ana Claudia Ruggieri; Grant Beneficiary<\/strong> Abmael da Silva Cardoso; Investment<\/strong> R$191,873.44.
\n5.<\/strong> Effect of monensin and functional oil on performance and methane emission in Nelore cattle in termination with low-carbon forage diets (n\u00ba. 14\/15150-0<\/a>); Grant Mechanism<\/strong> Regular Research Grant; Principal Investigator<\/strong> Renata Helena Branco Arnandes (Animal Institute); Investment<\/strong> R$214,216.36.<\/p>\n

Scientific articles<\/strong>
\nRUGGIERI, A.C. et al<\/em>. Grazing intensity impacts on herbage mass, sward structure, greenhouse gas emissions, and animal performance: analysis of Brachiaria pastureland<\/a>. Agronomy<\/strong>. Nov. 11, 2020.
\nOLIVEIRA, P. P. A. et al<\/em>. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome)<\/a>. Animal<\/strong>. Sept. 2020
\nCONGIO, G. F. S. et al<\/em>. Strategic grazing management towards sustainable intensification at tropical pasture-based dairy systems<\/a>. Science of the Total Environment<\/strong>. Sept. 15, 2018.
\nCONGIO, G. F. S. et al<\/em>. Strategic grazing management and nitrous oxide fluxes from pasture soils in tropical dairy systems<\/a>. Science of the Total Environment<\/strong>. Aug. 1, 2019.
\nROQUE, B. M. et al<\/em>. Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers<\/a>. PLOS ONE<\/strong>. Mar. 17, 2021.
\nARA\u00daJO, T. L. R. et al<\/em>. PSIX-2 Feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol reduces methane emissions by feedlot cattle<\/a>. Journal of Animal Science<\/strong>. Nov. 30, 2020.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Strategies with the potential to reduce the sector\u2019s impact on Earth\u2019s climate are already available to farmers","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":438234,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[156,169],"tags":[200,199],"coauthors":[116,1346],"class_list":["post-438263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cover","category-technology","tag-environment","tag-farming"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=438263"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438263\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":439219,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438263\/revisions\/439219"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/438234"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=438263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=438263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=438263"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=438263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}