{"id":444265,"date":"2022-07-22T18:06:56","date_gmt":"2022-07-22T21:06:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=444265"},"modified":"2022-07-27T11:36:52","modified_gmt":"2022-07-27T14:36:52","slug":"study-of-repatriated-brazilian-fossil-suggests-pterosaurs-had-colorful-feathers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/study-of-repatriated-brazilian-fossil-suggests-pterosaurs-had-colorful-feathers\/","title":{"rendered":"Study of repatriated Brazilian fossil suggests pterosaurs had colorful feathers"},"content":{"rendered":"

The fossilized crest of a pterosaur, a creature that 115 million years ago flew over what is now Chapada do Araripe in northeast Brazil, could change our understanding of the origin and evolution of feathers, structures currently only seen in birds, but that in the remote past were also found in dinosaurs. According to an article published in the scientific journal Nature <\/em>on April 20, the protuberance on the head of this extinct winged reptile was covered in two soft-tissue structures similar to colored feathers: one type was small and constituted by a single hair-like filament; and the other was larger with branches, more like the feathers of modern birds.<\/p>\n

The presence of these feathers or protofeathers of different shades\u2014it is impossible to know exactly what colors they were\u2014was identified by a group of European and Brazilian paleontologists who analyzed the fossilized crest and partial skull of a pterosaur of the species Tupandactylus imperator<\/em>. This was a large animal with an estimated wingspan of 5 meters. The fossil, previously in the possession of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences in Brussels, was amicably repatriated to the Earth Sciences Museum (MCTER) in Rio de Janeiro in February this year, with no legal proceedings involved (see the board<\/em><\/a>). Hebert Bruno Nascimento Campos, a biologist from Maur\u00edcio de Nassau University Center in Campina Grande, Para\u00edba, highlights the high quality of the pterosaur fossil\u2019s conservation. \u201cThe level of preservation of the soft structures is surprising,\u201d says Campos, one of two Brazilians who coauthored the paper. The other is Edio-Ernst Kischlat, a paleontologist from the Porto Alegre division of the Geological Survey of Brazil (CPRM).<\/p>\n

Using modern electron microscopy techniques, the scientists found two types of differently shaped melanosomes in the soft tissue of the crest preserved in rock. Melanosomes are organelles that carry the pigment melanin, which is what gives color to the skin and feathers of modern birds\u2014and some dinosaurs. One of the organelles is more rounded, the other is longer and oval. The melanosomes were identified inside pycnofibers, a type of dense filament that typically covers pterosaur skin. Some scholars consider pycnofibers a coat more similar to mammalian hair. Others, like the team behind the new study, argue that they are a variant of feathers.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn modern birds, feather color is strongly linked to the shape of the melanosomes,\u201d Maria McNamara, a paleontologist from University College Cork (UCC), Ireland, and one of the coordinators of the study, said in a press release. \u201cThe fact that the pterosaur feather types had different melanosome shapes means these animals had genes capable of controlling feather color. This shows that coloration was a critical feature of even the earliest feathers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pterosaurs were the closest evolutionary group of vertebrates to the dinosaurs, from which today’s birds descended. They were contemporaries that emerged and disappeared from Earth at almost the same times. They coexisted from 235 million years ago until 66 million years ago, when both groups went extinct. Since some dinosaurs and pterosaurs seem to have had colored feathers, McNamara’s team suggests that these structures must have a very ancient origin. Feathers, or something similar to them, must have been present among the vertebrates from which both dinosaurs and pterosaurs evolved around 250 million years ago.<\/p>\n

According to the authors of the paper, the feathers\u2014or protofeathers\u2014of the Tupandactylus<\/em> did not help it to fly. This seems like a paradox, since pterosaurs were the first vertebrates capable of taking flight, tens of millions of years before birds. The (possibly) colored feathers of the fossil from Araripe may have helped them control their body temperature or functioned as a type of visual signal to attract reproductive partners.<\/p>\n

\"\"

BENTON, M. J., Nature, 2022<\/span>The researchers identified two types of filament structure similar to feathers on the back of the pterosaur crestBENTON, M. J., Nature, 2022<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

British paleontologist Michael Benton of the University of Bristol, UK, is convinced that pycnofibers are a type of feather. \u201cThey are identical to certain dinosaur and bird feathers in every detail\u2014their general shape, size, branching, attachment to the skin, and the fact that they contain melanosomes,\u201d Benton said in an interview with Pesquisa<\/em> FAPESP<\/em>. The British scientist did not participate in the Araripe fossil study, but wrote a commentary on McNamara\u2019s article for Nature<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Alexander Kellner, a paleontologist who specializes in pterosaurs and director of the Brazilian National Museum in Rio de Janeiro, disagrees with Benton. \u201cI don\u2019t want to diminish the importance of this new study. It used very modern techniques, driving an important debate about the origin of feathers, and was based on quality material from Araripe, one of the best sites in the world for pterosaur fossils,\u201d says Kellner. “But I’m not convinced that the melanosomes were inside feathers.”<\/p>\n

In 1997, Kellner described the first known specimen of Tupandactylus imperator<\/em>, the species holotype. In 2009, based on a fossil from China, he gave the name pycnofibers to the filaments that typically cover the skin of pterosaurs. He states that pycnofibers are missing the essential characteristics of feathers, especially the rachis\u2014the main stem that a series of branches (the barbs) are attached to. \u201cIt is also possible that they aren\u2019t melanosomes at all and that the structures identified as feathers in the article are not from the epidermis [surface layer of the skin], but from the dermis [the innermost layer, below the epidermis],\u201d argues Kellner. \u201cThe cut open skin of a pterosaur could generate structures that could be mistaken for pycnofibers. I’ve seen this before in a dinosaur specimen.”<\/p>\n

It is not always easy to discern the different structures that make up the soft tissues in fossils. Organisms preserved in geological layers are usually flattened, their bodies pressed and \u201cstamped\u201d into the rock. This can make it difficult to separate and identify the soft parts of a fossil, such as the skin, muscles, and connective tissue.<\/p>\n

Paleontologists have been debating whether the filaments found on pterosaur skin can be considered feathers for at least five decades. With supporters on both sides, the discussion gained momentum after a small specimen of the winged reptiles was found in Kazakhstan, between central Asia and eastern Europe, and described in 1971. The fossil had a wingspan of just two feet, and parts of its body were unmistakably covered in the filaments. It is no coincidence that the species was named Sordes pilosus<\/em>, meaning \u201chairy devil\u201d in Latin.<\/p>\n

If it can be proven that the pterosaur pycnofibers are feathers, and especially if they were colored, the implication would be that these structures originated much earlier than currently thought. They may have been a feature of an animal group called Avemetatarsalia, a vertebrate lineage that includes both dinosaurs (and birds) and pterosaurs.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn this case, the simplest and most conservative scenario for the origin of feathers would be that structures equivalent to them, such as pycnofibers, appeared just once in the evolutionary process,\u201d says Max Langer, a paleontologist from the University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP), Ribeir\u00e3o Preto campus. \u201cFeathers would have appeared in the first Avemetatarsalia some 250 million years ago, which would have passed this characteristic onto lineages that later evolved into dinosaurs and pterosaurs.\u201d It is possible that feathers appeared more than once in evolutionary history, independently and at different times in dinosaurs and pterosaurs. But paleontologists like to embrace frugal hypotheses, since nature generally follows the easiest path.<\/a><\/p>\n

Negotiations lead to fossil\u2019s return
\n<\/strong>Artifact from Araripe was returned to Brazil in February and is now being stored in a museum in Rio de Janeiro<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"

Hebert Bruno Nascimento Campos<\/span>The fossil from Araripe that was repatriated from Belgium to Brazil in FebruaryHebert Bruno Nascimento Campos<\/span><\/p><\/div><\/p>\n

On Sunday, February 6 this year, a diplomatic pouch from Brussels, the capital of Belgium, arrived at Gale\u00e3o airport in Rio de Janeiro containing five pieces of rock\u2014four large and one small, that together form a 20-kilogram, 60-centimeter-by-60-centimeter block. The rock was imprinted with the crest and partial skull of a well-preserved fossil of the pterosaur species Tupandactylus imperator<\/em>, which lived in what is now Chapada do Araripe, on the border between the Brazilian states of Cear\u00e1, Pernambuco, and Piau\u00ed, 115 million years ago.<\/p>\n

The artifact was taken from Brazil illegally, like many other fossils from the region, at an unknown time, ending up in the hands of a private collector in Europe. An agreement for an amicable repatriation free of legal proceedings was signed on October 11 last year between the Brazilian embassy in Brussels and the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, where the fossil was held for study by the institution’s researchers. The fossil is now being stored in the Earth Sciences Museum (MCTER) in Rio de Janeiro, which is managed by the Geological Survey of Brazil (CPRM). \u201cIt is on display in an exhibition of Brazilian pterosaur fossils and models until May 7,\u201d says Rafael Costa da Silva, curator of the paleontology sector at MCTER.<\/p>\n

While studying pterosaur fossils at the State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe (SMNK) in Germany in 2016, biologist Hebert Bruno Nascimento Campos saw a video presentation by Aude Cincotta, a paleontologist who was doing a PhD at the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences at the time, about a pterosaur specimen from Araripe. \u201cI was interested in the artifact and asked if I could see it,\u201d says Campos. He went to Brussels and quickly examined the specimen. He later discovered that despite being at the Belgian institute, the fossil belonged to a private collector.<\/p>\n

In 2017, together with Cincotta, German paleontologist and SMNK curator Eberhard Frey, and two others, Campos gave a brief report on the fossil at a paleontology conference. He later contacted Brazilian paleontologist Edio-Ernst Kischlat from the Porto Alegre branch of the Geological Survey of Brazil (CPRM), who started an informal negotiation process on returning the fossil to Brazil with the directors of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences. Official negotiations with the institute were handled by Brazil\u2019s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and an agreement was successfully reached, resulting in the arrival of the fossil in February. Before the article about the apparently colored feathers from Tupandactylus <\/em>was published in Nature<\/em>, the artifact was already in Brazil.<\/p>\n

The outcome was very different to a previous situation involving another fossil from Araripe that was illegally taken from the country. In December 2020, British paleontologist David Martill of the University of Portsmouth, UK, and his colleagues published an article in the journal Cretaceous Research<\/em> describing a rare dinosaur specimen informally known as Ubirajara jubatus<\/em>, which lived 120 million years ago (see<\/em> Pesquisa FAPESP issue<\/em> n\u00ba 301<\/em><\/a>). The study, which did not convincingly explain the origin of the fossil, was heavily criticized by Brazilian paleontologists and on social media. In the end, Cretaceous Research<\/em> decided to retract the article. The dinosaur fossil in question is currently at SMNK. Eberhard Frey, who is a curator at the museum, was a coauthor of the retracted paper.<\/div>\n