{"id":474462,"date":"2023-05-17T14:49:05","date_gmt":"2023-05-17T17:49:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=474462"},"modified":"2023-05-17T14:49:05","modified_gmt":"2023-05-17T17:49:05","slug":"the-performance-of-covid-19-preprints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/the-performance-of-covid-19-preprints\/","title":{"rendered":"The performance of COVID-19 preprints"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just over half of COVID-19 preprints uploaded in 2020 were later accepted for publication in scientific journals, according to a survey by researchers from teaching and research institutions in Austria, Denmark, and Spain. Preprints are scientific papers published on open-access platforms as soon as they are written, before undergoing any peer-review process. Led by physician Carl Llor of the University of Southern Denmark, the authors studied 3,343 COVID-19 preprints uploaded to the medRxiv repository between January and December 2020. They went back to these papers in March 2022 and found that only 1,712 (51.2%) had undergone peer review and been published in specialist journals (<em>Jama Network Open<\/em>, December 8). The team repeated the analysis seven months later and found that the number of preprints accepted for publication had risen to 1,742 (52.1%).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Half of COVID-19 preprints uploaded in 2020 were later accepted for publication","protected":false},"author":475,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1651],"tags":[247],"coauthors":[785],"class_list":["post-474462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notes","tag-medicine","keywords-coronavirus-en","keywords-covid-19-en","keywords-sars-cov-2-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/475"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=474462"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474462\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":474463,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474462\/revisions\/474463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=474462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=474462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=474462"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=474462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}