{"id":516193,"date":"2024-07-31T14:30:50","date_gmt":"2024-07-31T17:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=516193"},"modified":"2024-07-31T14:30:50","modified_gmt":"2024-07-31T17:30:50","slug":"fossil-lineage-found-in-rio-grande-do-sul-survived-the-worlds-biggest-extinction-event","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/fossil-lineage-found-in-rio-grande-do-sul-survived-the-worlds-biggest-extinction-event\/","title":{"rendered":"Fossil lineage found in Rio Grande do Sul survived the world\u2019s biggest extinction event"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paleontologists found the fossil of an amphibian that lived some 250 million years ago, before dinosaurs existed. Named Kwatisuchus rosai<\/em>, the animal, about 1.5 meters long, was related to species already on record in Russia. This discovery confirms suspicions that animals in that age occupied Pangea, the earth mass that then united the current continents.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was a predator that lived for most of its time in rivers and lakes,\u201d says paleontologist Felipe Pinheiro, of the Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA), in the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. His workplace at the S\u00e3o Gabriel campus is one hour from the excavation site: a farm in the town of Ros\u00e1rio do Sul, in the west of the state. The animal, described in January in scientific journal The Anatomical Record<\/em>, was identified based on fossilized snout bones, uncovered in 2022.<\/p>\n

K. rosai<\/em> was part of a group of amphibians known as temnospondiles, shallow-water predators with long snouts similar to those of crocodiles, adapted for capturing fish\u2014for this reason they were confused with reptiles. \u201cAmong the anatomical features that suggest kinship with current amphibians, some temnospondiles present evidence of a larval stage, similar to tadpoles,\u201d explains Pinheiro.<\/p>\n

This group survived the planet\u2019s biggest extinction event at the end of the Permian period (299 million to 252 million years ago), when around 90% of marine species and 70% of land-based wildlife disappeared. In a devastated world where large animals were eliminated, this amphibian was one of the most sizeable.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese types of small, strong, and little-diversified animals recolonized the planet,\u201d observes Salvadoran paleontologist Juan Carlos Cisneros, of the Federal University of Piau\u00ed (UFPI), who did not take part in the study. Among them were the cynodonts, ancestors of the mammals, and the archosaurs, reptiles from which the dinosaurs, crocodiles, and birds evolved. \u201cAll were less than 1 meter long.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"

Alice Dias <\/span>Fossilized snout bones enabled description of the speciesAlice Dias <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

He goes on to say that K. rosai<\/em> also hunted on land, carrying the advantage of having a varied diet, and probably the ability to build mucus-lined dens where it protected itself during the dry season. Cisneros states that all the animals of the period dug tunnels to protect themselves, and burrows with the skeletons of other similar amphibians have been found in South Africa.<\/p>\n

Temnospondiles became dominant during the Triassic period (252 million to 201 million years ago), but were replaced by the crocodiles, which occupied the same environment but were larger, laying shelled eggs. Consequently, they were drought-resistant, while the amphibians depended on water to reproduce.<\/p>\n

The name Kwatisuchus <\/em>comes from the Indigenous language Tupi word kwati<\/em>, which means long snout, and the Greek suchus<\/em>, for crocodile. The additional word rosai<\/em> is a nod to paleontologist A\u0301tila Stock Da-Rosa, of the Federal University of Santa Maria, who helped to locate, preserve, and study the formation housing the fossil site, known as Sanga do Cabral. This is the only location in Brazil with records of the period that followed the Permian-Triassic extinction.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe UNIPAMPA team is uncovering important and little-known wildlife in Brazil,\u201d says palaeontologist Max Langer, of the University of S\u00e3o Paulo\u2019s Ribeir\u00e3o Preto campus, who did not participate in the study. He states that many fossils from this period have been found in countries such as China, Australia, Russia, and South Africa. \u201cThe connection with wildlife in the current Russia is evident at sites across Brazil\u2019s Paran\u00e1, Rio Grande do Sul, and Maranh\u00e3o States.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>

\n \n \n \n <\/picture>Alexandre Affonso \/ Revista Pesquisa FAPESP<\/span><\/div>
\n

The great migration<\/strong>
\nAccording to Pinheiro, animals such as K. rosai<\/em> likely migrated from one river to another, in the same way as cayman species that colonized Brazil. The researcher emphasizes that fossil-recording issues make it difficult to say which route the amphibians took between the current Brazil and Russia.<\/p>\n

He and his team propose two possible journeys: by the first and shortest, the animals may have crossed the central region of Pangea. This route would contradict the prevailing idea that large mountain chains isolated the northern hemisphere of Pangea, known as Laurasia, from its southern hemisphere Gondwana. \u201cPerhaps these mountains were not impassable as we once thought, but had dips where the animals could pass,\u201d suggests the UNIPAMPA researcher.<\/p>\n

The other route may have been via an archipelago: the Cathaysian bridge. This would have required crossing stretches of ocean. \u201cThey may have done this using natural rafts fashioned from plants, as the monkeys did to get to America,\u201d proposes Cisneros. According to the researcher, it is possible that these animals were more resistant to saltwater than current amphibians.<\/p>\n

It remains to be explained, however, why K. rosai<\/em> and other animals collected at Sanga do Cabral have no relatives in South Africa, at that time located in a region contiguous with what is now Brazil. \u201cThere is no evidence of any barrier between one region and the other,\u201d says Pinheiro.<\/p>\n

As with the current climate crisis, the Permian-Triassic extinction was caused by the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere\u2014the result of intense volcanic activity in the region now known as Siberia. \u201cA diverse ecosystem, with large predators and herbivores, disappeared,\u201d explains Pinheiro. He says that recovery was slow, as any climate variation in a degraded environment could cause new extinctions. Twenty million years later, the first dinosaurs emerged, and came to prevail in increasingly more complex ecosystems.<\/p>\n

Scientific article
\n<\/strong>PINHEIRO, F. et al<\/em>. Interrelationships among Early Triassic faunas of Western Gondwana and Laurasia as illuminated by a new South American benthosuchid temnospondyl.<\/a> The Anatomical Record.<\/strong> Online. Jan. 19, 2024.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Predator lived 252 million years ago and had relatives in the region of present-day Eastern Europe, in what is now Russia","protected":false},"author":545,"featured_media":516202,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[159],"tags":[255,266],"coauthors":[1498],"class_list":["post-516193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science","tag-paleontology","tag-zoology"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/545"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=516193"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516193\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":527089,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516193\/revisions\/527089"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/516202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=516193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=516193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=516193"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=516193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}