{"id":543656,"date":"2025-03-20T18:06:30","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T21:06:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/?p=543656"},"modified":"2025-03-20T18:06:30","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T21:06:30","slug":"air-pollution-harms-pollinators-more-than-pests-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/air-pollution-harms-pollinators-more-than-pests-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Air pollution harms pollinators more than pests"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bees, wasps, moths, butterflies, and other pollinators are more harmed by air pollution than the pests that destroy agricultural crops, according to a study by the University of Reading, UK. Researchers analyzed data from 120 scientific articles on 40 types of insects from 19 countries to understand the potential effects of air pollutants such as ozone, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter. When subject to heavy pollution, especially high ozone concentrations, the number of pollinators fell by 39%, while the number of aphids and other pests remained almost unchanged. \u201cAir pollution is an underappreciated threat to the insects that make our lives easier,\u201d said James Ryalls, the leader of the study, in a statement. \u201cThe bees that pollinate our flowers and the wasps that provide natural pest control are at risk of further decline if air pollution levels are not addressed.\u201d The scientists hypothesize that air pollutants may alter the smells that pollinators use to locate flowers or find mates (<em>Nature Communications <\/em>and University of Reading, July 11).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Europe demands at least 30% of ecosystems to be restored by 2030","protected":false},"author":475,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1651],"tags":[224,200],"coauthors":[785],"class_list":["post-543656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notes","tag-ecology","tag-environment"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/543656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/475"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=543656"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/543656\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":543657,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/543656\/revisions\/543657"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=543656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=543656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=543656"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistapesquisa.fapesp.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=543656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}